Certain well- liked issues that distribute on our catalog are popular books, solution key, test test questions and answer, information example, practice manual, test sample, consumer guidebook, owners guide, assistance instruction, repair guidebook, and so on. All e-book downloads come as-is, and all privileges stay with the experts. We've e-books for every issue readily available for download. We also have a superb collection of pdfs for individuals faculty publications, for example educational schools textbooks, kids books which could assist your youngster during college sessions or to get a college degree.
Dual function design and totally loving it! I'm glad Like Test Prep compiled such a monstrous list of sample essays on different writing topics. The first part of the book had some solid essay writing tips while the rest is full of samples.
You can check out each sample in the table of contents so navigation is pretty easy. I admit though that I got a bit overwhelmed by the amount of content. Might be just me but maybe it could have been shorted to like sample essays.
I would have considered the paperback version at a reduced price with lesser content resulting to a lighter book. But as a digital copy, I'll gladly keep it and the essays are written well! This book is very long but it was worth it. Video games are just the latest thing to rile up uptight adults who fear that their children are getting dangerous ideas from the new medium. In the past, that came from racial segregation and censorship.
Today, it comes from economic inequality and anti-corporatism. So video games provide a convenient strawman to the older power holders so that they can avoid the real issues that cause violence. We also need to remember that most of us can see a difference between what is real and what is not. If a person is mentally sound, and indulges once in a while in a video game, he will turn off that video game and just go on with his normal life without feeling the need to pick up a loaded gun and shoot the first person he sees.
However, this is what the moral crusaders are suggesting: video games create instant murderers. We also need to remember that although violence might make for a great news story, it is getting much more rare in the real world, something that people find easy to either forget or disbelieve. But thanks to increased policing and surveillance, crime has become rarer now than it has been over the last hundred years.
So everyone knows that video games and reality are different, because reality gets too mundane to cope with all the time, and video games provide an escape from that. So the moral backlash against video games is another backlash against a popular form of entertainment that goes back nearly a century.
However, the majority of us can differentiate reality from fantasy, and that real life is much more boring than in video games. First off, this is a common cry of moral crusaders that has been heard ad nauseum even though the evidence shows.
Video games are just the latest thing to rile up uptight adults who fear that their children are getting dangerous ideas. So video games provide a convenient strawman to the older power holders so that they can avoid the real issues that. So everyone knows that video games and reality are different, because reality gets too mundane to cope with all the. So the moral backlash against video games is another backlash against a popular form of entertainment that goes back.
Some children are picky eaters. Argument: Children should not be given the freedom to eat whatever foods they want. Support 1: Obviously, when given the option, children will pick only tasty foods.
Support 2: We have an obligation to introduce our children to different types of food. Support 3: Parents need to remain the authority figure in the home. However, I do not think children should be allowed to eat only what they want. First off, children will only want what taste good, and that could lead to unhealthy eating.
Second off, it can keep kids from exploring new, exciting foods that they might actually like. And thirdly, letting the kids pick their meals too often will take control away from the parents and give it to the kids. When children are allowed to choose their own food, they will always pick the tasty options. However, the tasty food will not always be good for them.
Many of the foods they choose will be loaded with sugar and fat because kids like sugar and fat. This could possibly add to the increasing problem of childhood obesity. They can also have stomach problems or have weaker bones, muscles, or organs in the future. Put the new food on their plate, but only a little, and encourage them to try it. They may see everyone else eating and liking the food and will get curious.
If they eat it, congratulations, your child is now a little less picky. It can really get your kids excited about eating healthy. We also need to remember that parents should be the ones in charge, not the kids. If parents allow their kids to dictate their meal choices, where does it end?
Children will start running our lives when we should be controlling theirs. So the control of what food gets put in front of children should belong to the parents, and not the children, because children only care about tasty things and not good nutrition. Finally, parents need to be firm in their food choices if they want to maintain discipline with their kids.
That why I feel that parents should make their kids eat things they refuse to eat. Argument: Children should be entitled to choose their own outfits. Support 1: Children need the freedom of expression that comes in the form of choosing their own clothing.
Support 2: Children tend to do whatever they can to undermine authority figures. Support 3: Child-molesters do not choose their victims based on their choice in clothing. Thesis: Because children should not have their freedoms restricted, they should be given the option to dress whatever way they like. Children should have the freedom to dress however they want. Thirdly, most of the parental fears about attracting unwanted attention from child molesters is widely overblown.
So children ought to be able to express themselves through their clothes. When children are given the freedom to choose their own clothes, they can show their tastes and personalities by the kinds of clothes or colors that they wear. Bright colors show that the child is in a good mood or is happy with life. They can display the cartoon characters or sports they like most by wearing their likeness on their shirt. This is a display of who this child is, and every child has a right to an identity and to share that with the world.
This is why kids will often change their clothes when they are away and change back when they return. This can get tiresome for the children and can upset the parents should they find out. No one will have to get angry at anybody and everyone will feel better if children could just choose their own clothes. This fear is ridiculous for three reasons. Second of all, the number of child molester cases has dropped off significantly thanks to the numerous laws providing stiff penalties and sex-offender registries that act as deterrents to would be molesters.
Children have rights just like everybody else and that should always include their wardrobe choices. This is a way for children to express themselves freely.
Second of all, the number of child molester cases has dropped off significantly thanks to the numerous laws providing. Argument: I would save my money at the bank.
Support 1: My money is safer in the bank than at home. Support 2: I can earn interest by keeping my money in the bank. Support 3: If I keep my money in a bank, I can withdraw money from lots of places. Thesis: Because saving my money at a bank is much more advantageous than keeping my money at home, I prefer to save my money at a bank. I would always choose a bank to keep my money safe over my home. First off, the bank is always more secure than my house.
Second of all, I can earn interest by depositing my money into an account. Finally, a bank keeps money digitally these days, as opposed to securing hard currency which is much harder. The first thing that we must always remember is that a bank will have many layers of security while the average home usually has just one. Banks will have large vaults where they will keep their reserve cash safe and for their safe deposit boxes.
They will also have armed guards stationed in their office to thwart any attempt to rob the place. It is also harder to break in from the outside because it has thick walls, heavily secured doors, laser alarms and surveillance cameras. Secondly, an account at the bank entitles me to earn interest on my investment. This is because banks charge interest on loans that they give out from the deposits of their depositors.
That interest then gets added to the deposits that I and other bank depositors. So with every dollar I put into the bank, I can expect a percentage added to that every month, and this helps build my savings.
Saving money in a bank is always a smart and safe investment. Finally, we must all remember that leaving large amounts of cash anywhere is incredibly risky. So your money cannot be taken as easily as if it were left in the form of cash in your house. So the advantages of saving money in a bank are too great to be ignored.
The security of a bank will make it nearly impossible for your funds to ever be stolen. The money you put in a bank can get you interest in that investment and give you more money in the long-run. And banks never leave it in cash form, which can be stolen easily. Second of all, I can earn interest from depositing my money into an account.
The first thing that we must always remember is that a bank will have many layers of security while the average home. So with every dollar I put into the bank, I can expect a percentage added to that every month, and this helps build up. Argument: If I could choose my own study hours, I would study for five hours a day. Support 1: If I study more than five hours, I will get distracted. Support 2: Spending more than five hours studying will just be a waste of time.
Support 3: I need to have time to work my part-time job. Thesis: Because studying for more than five hours will cause me to be unproductive and it will interfere with other activities, I would choose to study for five hours a day. I would probably set aside five hours for studying each day. Anything more than five hours could be seen as simply wasteful because after a certain point our attention span shuts down. So students should only have to dedicate five hours of their time to studying.
Five hours is a good number of hours to set aside, particularly in the middle of the day, for studying. The hours between 1 and 6 P. Too early, and your grogginess or hunger could distract you. So that five hour stretch in the afternoon is actually the best time for anyone to study. Going any longer than five hours could be potentially wasteful because our minds will eventually tire if we try to go on for too long. For me this happens when I start studying at the beginning of the day. I find myself having to break for lunch because I get hungry.
But when I start again, I find myself getting tired in the midafternoon, when most students start to think about their free time. So that period between one and six ought to be the time I study. We also need to remember that as students, we have lives outside of studying. Many of us do volunteer work or work part-time jobs to earn money. I work at nights to save up for paying for school, something my parents insist me on doing. The reason I put in at least five hours of study time is so that I can balance out my work schedule with my schooling.
This is so that nothing can distract me from receiving high marks and working my way through. So those are the reasons that five hours in the afternoon should be all one needs for studying.
The right five hours can help you focus your energy and attention on the task at hand. Any more than that, and you could burn out or lose focus and that just wastes. And many of us have jobs or other extracurricular activities that require us to stop studying for a bit. Anything more than five hours could be seen as simply wasteful because after a certain point our attention span shuts. Going any longer than five hours could be potentially wasteful because our minds will eventually tire if we try to go on.
Argument: I think it's important for children to learn to swim at an early age. Support 1: It will be easier to learn more advanced swimming techniques if you start swimming early on. Support 2: Kids should know how to swim to increase their self-confidence. Support 3: Kids will be more comfortable in the water. Thesis: Because it will help them later in life, children should learn how to swim at an early age.
I think it is absolutely important for children to learn to swim at an early age. Learning to swim early assures that they will have success learning to swim in the future.
It gives children confidence in their abilities to do thing on their own if they can do this one thing on their own.
First of all, helping children learn to swim early can help them in improving their swimming abilities in the future. But before they can do any of that, they must learn how to tread water, breathe, and move through water.
When they can master the basics, they can excel at swimming when they want to move on. The next thing that makes getting children to swim early is that it will increase their confidence in doing many things on their own. Along with riding a two-wheeler, learning this difficult skill will help them gain confidence in navigating the world themselves.
Then they can move on to learning to cook, travel through their hometowns, and walking to school by themselves. Children need to have confidence if they want to become successful adults, and learning to swim early can attribute to that.
The last thing that makes learning to swim a good idea is that it helps children become comfortable in water much earlier. It can certainly throw a person off and cause him to panic.
But if a person is comfortable in water, then that person can navigate it without trouble. It helps them learn more difficult forms of swimming. It gives them confidence in finding their way to navigate their world. Therefore, it is a good idea to get children to swim at an early age. The next thing that makes getting children to swim early beneficial is that it will increase their confidence in doing.
Along with riding a two-wheeler, learning this difficult skill will help them gain confidence in navigating the world. Children need to have confidence if they want to become successful adults, and learning to swim early can attribute to. The last thing that makes learning to swim a good idea is that it helps children become comfortable in water much. In some families, the mother does all the cooking. Do you think older children should learn to cook so they can help prepare the family meals sometimes?
Argument: Some of the children should learn to cook for the family at times. Support 1: Their parents might be unable to cook. Support 2: They need to learn to be independent. Support 3: Kids in general want to do things on their own. Thesis: Because it will help kids grow and be more independent, I think older children should learn how to cook. I think that some of the children should learn to cook for the family at times because the parents might both end up being unable to.
This is something useful they can learn that can help them down the road. First off, parents may not be able to do the task themselves. They might both work or they might end up getting sick. Either way, the kids are on their own. But when they reach a certain height and have a certain amount of trust and responsibility, they should be allowed to learn some basic skills and some easy recipes to make.
When they get older, they can start learning to make more complex meals and even be able to serve their parents one night.
This can be a big help to the family if the kids can be an additional source of meals. The kids will also have to expect this, so the parents should not only teach them, but require them to cook on a night or two. That way, the kids learn to feed themselves. The last thing we need to remember is that kids want to be able to do things by themselves. But when the kids reach about the age of ten, they feel that they are smart enough to do things that their parents help them with constantly.
Kids always feel the most proud when they can do things themselves. So making a meal by themselves can be a source of pride for kids who get very little trust because their parents fear the worst. The parents may not be able to at times, because of work or health problems.
Also, one day, the parents will not be there to take of them, so they better learn now. Finally, it can be a source of pride for kids who have little trust placed in them. First of all the parents might both end up being unable to. The kids will also have to expect this, so the parents should not only teach them, but require them to cook on a night.
So making a meal by themselves can be a source of pride for kids who get very little trust because their parents fear. When learning a foreign language, some people think that speaking is important, when others think that writing is more important. Which skill do you think is more important? Argument: Speaking is the most important skill in foreign language learning. Support 1: We have to talk to people when are abroad.
Support 2: Fluency is judged through speaking, not writing. Support 3: Speaking a foreign language well will help us more when trying to get a job. Thesis: Because speaking is fast and useful, I think that speaking is the most important skills when learning a foreign language. First off, when traveling, we talk to other people rather than write notes to one another. Secondly, people often judge your fluency by how you speak, not how you write.
When we travel overseas, to the country with the language we learn, we speak to other people directly. It also looks silly to anyone who happens to be nearby when they see this. So speaking face to face while abroad is a lot more expected than writing short notes to each other. The next thing to remember is that fluency is judged through speech, not through writing.
Grammar and spelling mistakes can easily be overlooked, but speech mistakes are going to be noticed right away. Not having fluency in the interview will hurt your standing with the employer and have someone else possibly take the job. The employer will also want you to speak about your abilities with confidence and a good fluent speech is key in that area.
So an interview shows how well you speak could be a make or break factor in getting employed. So those are why speaking is more important than writing. We always speak face to face because writing while face to face looks odd. Fluency is judged on how fluent and accent-free your speech. That is something not easily explained away. And job interviewers will look for speaking ability as the main factor in communication. So speech is more important than writing.
Not having fluency in the interview will hurt your standing with the employer and have someone else possibly take the. So an interview shows how well you speak could be a make-or-break factor in getting employed.
Fluency is judged on how fluent and accent-free your speech is. And that not easily explained away. Argument: My favorite ethnic food is Mexican food. Support 1: Mexican cuisine uses very simple ingredients. Support 2: Mexican food always reminds one of home-cooking. Support 3: Mexican food can be made either mild or spicy.
Thesis: Because it is simple, comforting, and versatile, Mexican food is my favorite ethnic food. Like this presentation?
Why not share! Embed Size px. Start on. Show related SlideShares at end. WordPress Shortcode. Published in: Education. Ati rated it it was amazing May 24, Warunya Rudisirisak rated it it was amazing Sep 12, Lino Brown rated it did not like it May 19, Le Thuong rated it it was amazing Oct 24, Sykira rated it liked it Jun 02, Maia Liparteliani rated it really liked it Aug 21, Maria rated it it was amazing Jul 29, Innayatullah Armal rated it really liked it May 16, Umair rated it really liked it Mar 12, Saad Shabbir rated it it was ok Aug 20, Eimon Kyaw rated it it was amazing Nov 10, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.